Research on public perceptions of sexual offences sentencing published

Research on public perceptions of sexual offences sentencing published

Lord Matthews

New research carried out on behalf of the Scottish Sentencing Council has found a lack of awareness over the offences created by the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 and suggests the public should be engaged on the range and scope of sexual offences.

The independently conducted research was undertaken by ScotCen Social Research and highlights the role of the media in influencing perceptions of sentencing and in raising awareness of sentencing and offending behaviour.

While there was an overall perception that sentencing of sexual offences was too lenient, when members of the public gave a sentence in an exercise based on a real world case, their decision was similar to that of the judge. When told this, participants expressed surprise.

Participants acknowledged the need to maintain flexibility and judicial discretion in sentencing to allow the individual circumstances of the case to be taken into account. But they also said they found it difficult to understand why sentences for similar cases can vary, perceiving this as inconsistency.

In line with other such research carried out under the auspices of the council, participants thought that greater transparency in sentencing is needed and that guidelines will provide consistency.

Members of the public also felt that the risk of reoffending and the protection of the public were important factors to consider during sentencing. While they had mixed views on the use of imprisonment for sexual offences, there was consensus that sentencing should address offending behaviour and that offenders should have access to support to aid rehabilitation.

There were differing views on how courts should take account of harm. Some were of the view that because the impact can differ from one victim or survivor to another, all sexual offences had the potential to be equally harmful; others felt that offences involving contact – such as rape and sexual assault – were more harmful than non-contact offences (such as voyeurism or sexual exposure.

Similarly, there was no consensus on whether sentencing should take account of the personal circumstances of the offender and their remorse.

Lord Matthews, senator member of the council and member of the Sexual Offences Committee, said: “We would like to thank all those who took part in the study. We are especially grateful to the survivors who bravely shared their experiences of the criminal justice system and their views on sentencing. We will carefully consider the full findings of this and other research in development of the guidelines, which we hope will provide greater clarity and predictability for everyone. Where concerns are raised which fall outside of the remit of the Council, we will share these findings with the relevant organisations and government.

“This research echoes the findings of other studies which have been carried out relating to sentencing. Namely that, when surveyed, a majority of people express the view that sentencing is lenient in Scotland. However, when carrying out exercises based on real world scenarios, and asked to consider the matter in more detail, members of the public trend to choose sentences in line with judges.

“This report highlights the need for greater public information on sentencing and how sentences are arrived at. We hope that in part this will be addressed by sentencing guidelines, in particular the sentencing process guideline which has been submitted to the High Court for approval. In addition to guidelines, we will consider what other work we can take forward, in conjunction with others, to increase public knowledge and awareness on sentencing for these offences.”

Share icon
Share this article: