Reform of heritable securities focus of new law commission paper

Reform of heritable securities focus of new law commission paper

Professor Frankie McCarthy

The Scottish Law Commission has today published a second discussion paper consulting on reform of the law of securities granted over land and buildings in Scotland.

Heritable securities, often referred to as ‘mortgages’, are essential to the economy. Without them, many people could not afford to buy their homes or grow their businesses. A heritable security allows a creditor to take particular types of legal action against a debtor if they default on their debt.

In practice, what this usually looks like is a lender eventually selling a borrower’s home or business property if the borrower becomes unable to repay their mortgage loan. When and how a creditor can take action, and the protections in place for the debtor when it does, are the focus of the discussion paper.

Scottish government statistics show that at least 2,204 “repossession” cases were initiated in the Scottish courts in 2019/2020. The law governing this form of debt enforcement should provide an effective, efficient procedure which incorporates appropriate protection for the most vulnerable debtors. Much of the current legislation dates back over 50 years, however, and has been made more complex by piecemeal amendments over the years. It is questionable whether the current regime remains fit for purpose.

In this paper, the commission proposes a new, streamlined scheme for enforcement of heritable securities in Scotland. It considers in detail:

  • the circumstances which should trigger a security holder’s right to take action against a debtor;
  • the steps a security holder must take prior to exercising the security, including enhanced protections available to debtors who are at risk of losing their homes;
  • the remedies available as a result of the security, including the power to collect rent from tenants where the mortgaged property is leased, the power to eject occupants and sell the property, and the power to foreclose (where the security holder takes ownership of the property itself);
  • the expenses of enforcement action and how these should be met.
  • It also considers issues of ranking between securities (where more than one security has been granted over the same property).
  • It seeks views from consultees on 69 questions, including:
  • whether security holders should be subject to a duty to conform with reasonable standards of commercial practice when exercising remedies?
  • which debtors and properties should qualify for enhanced protection under the scheme?
  • how should a new “default notice” system operate to ensure a debtor has fair warning that a security holder may take action?
  • should a security holder be allowed to exercise any remedies as a result of the security other than sale of the property, collection of rental income from the property, or foreclosure?
  • While the general ethos of the project is to aim for “evolution, not revolution” in the law, these provisional proposals are designed to achieve substantial improvements across the enforcement process as a whole.

The commission is very keen to hear from everyone with an interest in the issues raised in the discussion paper, including individuals with home mortgage loans, small and medium sized enterprises, third sector organisations who work with debtors, and legal practitioners and academics. Comments can be made until 1 April 2022, and will help shape the recommendations to be made in the final report.

Professor Frankie McCarthy, the lead commissioner, said: “It is a fact of life that lenders will sometimes have to exercise their mortgage rights to recoup money owed. It is vital for both borrowers and lenders that the law is as clear as possible on how this can happen, and that appropriate protection is given to debtors, particularly where they may be at risk of losing their home.

“This discussion paper asks important questions about how to improve the current law and strike the right balance between the interests of borrowers and lenders. We hope to hear from a wide range of people to ensure our eventual recommendations for reform take into account the needs of everyone with an interest in mortgage law in Scotland.”

Share icon
Share this article: